<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Show us a better way&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/</link>
	<description>Justin Kerr-Stevens on communications, social media and government 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:23:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kerr-Stevens</title>
		<link>http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kerr-Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Richard - Great to hear that there will be an element of crowd-sourcing in deciding the winner. Recognise this isn&#039;t without its&#039; difficulties -PR weeks recent blog contest springs to mind (http://blogs.bnet.com/pr/?p=287)

David - thanks for the link to peer-to-patent I hadn&#039;t seen it before.

Hillary - agree the process needs to be transparent. If you liked show us a better way you might also like this: http://www.buildingdemocracy.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &#8211; Great to hear that there will be an element of crowd-sourcing in deciding the winner. Recognise this isn&#8217;t without its&#8217; difficulties -PR weeks recent blog contest springs to mind (<a href="http://blogs.bnet.com/pr/?p=287" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.bnet.com/pr/?p=287</a>)</p>
<p>David &#8211; thanks for the link to peer-to-patent I hadn&#8217;t seen it before.</p>
<p>Hillary &#8211; agree the process needs to be transparent. If you liked show us a better way you might also like this: <a href="http://www.buildingdemocracy.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buildingdemocracy.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillary hartley</title>
		<link>http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>hillary hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-120</guid>
		<description>the peer-to-patent model is an excellent suggestion...open participation, but clear communication that the government (or PoI in this case) will be making the final decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the peer-to-patent model is an excellent suggestion&#8230;open participation, but clear communication that the government (or PoI in this case) will be making the final decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricallan</title>
		<link>http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>ricallan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the suggestion, Justin.  We&#039;re working on the judging process at the moment and an element of crowd-sourcing is definitely on the agenda for inclusion.  We need to think through the mechanics of this and the normal constraints of propriety etc. but I am confident that we will be able to find a way to make this work.  Will announce this on the PoI blog when settled.

Richard Allan
PoI Task Force Chair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the suggestion, Justin.  We&#8217;re working on the judging process at the moment and an element of crowd-sourcing is definitely on the agenda for inclusion.  We need to think through the mechanics of this and the normal constraints of propriety etc. but I am confident that we will be able to find a way to make this work.  Will announce this on the PoI blog when settled.</p>
<p>Richard Allan<br />
PoI Task Force Chair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osimod</title>
		<link>http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>osimod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Hi. I think the best way is to use the peer-to-patent approach. Let people make the first selection of a shortlist, and the let government do the final decision. 
see http://peertopatent.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I think the best way is to use the peer-to-patent approach. Let people make the first selection of a shortlist, and the let government do the final decision.<br />
see <a href="http://peertopatent.org/" rel="nofollow">http://peertopatent.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillary hartley</title>
		<link>http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>hillary hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-117</guid>
		<description>oh my goodness, i LOVE Show Us a Better Way!!!  we need to get that built in the US ASAP.

and yes, there should be some way to rate these ideas, rather than the committee deciding.  probably something like SXSW -- they are upfront about the fact that the panel programming is decided by three (nearly) equal parts:
30% public (via panel picker)
30% staff
40% advisory board

thanks for the link, justin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my goodness, i LOVE Show Us a Better Way!!!  we need to get that built in the US ASAP.</p>
<p>and yes, there should be some way to rate these ideas, rather than the committee deciding.  probably something like SXSW &#8212; they are upfront about the fact that the panel programming is decided by three (nearly) equal parts:<br />
30% public (via panel picker)<br />
30% staff<br />
40% advisory board</p>
<p>thanks for the link, justin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/show-us-a-better-way/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extendedreach.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Oh, I LIKE that. Good idea. Was wondering how they would judge such a large number entries but that is a great thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I LIKE that. Good idea. Was wondering how they would judge such a large number entries but that is a great thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
